PDA

View Full Version : Tink's trial


Mr Ears
09-20-2009, 06:31 AM
Tink is charged to have repeatedly attacked an innocent bystander who, on top of all, was on vacation and therefore had no way being able to respond the cowardly attacks.

(The quoted monument is already taken care of and will be rendered to the right hands at 1:00 pm EST server time today - everyone welcome in 0S who feels like eyewitnessing)

He did that while the forum and Sabah communities had tried to work out a form of peace with Tink and end the animosities.

Under those circumstances, his deed was even more shameless and disgraceful.

The prosecution pleads guilty and calls for a conviction of 2 months. 2 months without Tink being allowed to hold a monument in Sabah.

The terms of conviction will be executed by my local outlets in Sabah. If convicted, any of his efforts to get a monument will get impeded.

You, dear forum community, you are the grand jury. Should he be convicted to 2 months of monument possession prohibition, or not?

Now it's all about your faithful decision, dear forum community. Yes or no.

(Those who want to abstain just don't vote)

abana
09-20-2009, 07:55 AM
I voted "no". Tink would then be attacking everyone!

thechris
09-20-2009, 08:38 AM
no no and NO even if he did attack hers, all monuments are fair game:p
and if you think thats wronge, then why do you get rid of his monuments? that only frees up a spot for him to attack more:eek:

Tinkerbell
09-20-2009, 10:07 AM
No

...here we go again...

LOL !!!

I am not a griefer. You are, Ears. So is abana. You created your Sabah Ears account for only one reason. To stalk & grief me.

...for those following along...

Again, I took JuliaSet's monuments cuz she spread viscous lies about me on her forum & refuses to retract & apologize. It has been posted by me in zillions of threads by you & your other 2nd forum moniker Anonymous Top Ranker. And by abana. And by a few other pitiful posters.

No one believes you any longer. Try a 4th forum moniker (4th since you no longer use your original to try to stay above the fray).

By the way, you cannot stop me from having monuments. You can only try & fail, just like the others. Bring it on!

...God I LOVE this game! ...

:D

Mr Ears
09-20-2009, 10:35 AM
@Tink was this your closing argument in defense?

Fine. You're entitled to state one. This is supposed to be a fair trial.

But you can be sure that there are enough powers to make certain that your conviction will be enforced (IF you get convicted).

By the way: You are calling me names again, you are applying defamatory statements again. You don't wanna collect more violations on your list of charges, do you? ;)

P.S: You didn't expect to grief JuliaSet on vacation AGAIN and to get away with it, did you?

Tinkerbell
09-20-2009, 10:57 AM
P.S: You didn't expect to grief JuliaSet on vacation AGAIN and to get away with it, did you?

<sigh>

Again, JuliaSet is not on vacation. Hers is an abandoned account.

I made a promise to JuliaSet, eons ago. You can blame abana for my attacks on JuliaSet. abana, a CBC Moderator, triggered the promise when she griefed me on both servers.

Promises made. Promises kept!

:D

EDIT: You wanna finally come out of the closet & from under your rock, and share with the rest of the class who you really are, Drama Queen? Hmmm?

Mr Ears
09-20-2009, 11:46 AM
Again, JuliaSet is not on vacation. Hers is an abandoned account.

Nope. Blue signal means vacation. Abandoned would be grey.

You wanna finally come out of the closet & from under your rock, and share with the rest of the class who you really are, Drama Queen? Hmmm?

What do you want to hear, Tink?


By the way, here (http://www.tiltedmill.com/forums/showpost.php?p=266581&postcount=36) I forgave you for everything and declared peace with you.

As you can see, I have the best intentions... but you keep upsetting them. :/

I could never imagine that you would attack JuliaSet on vacation a second time and just a couple of weeks later. That is unacceptable and changes a lot...

Tinkerbell
09-20-2009, 01:00 PM
You are getting very sloppy, Ears. You & your "buddy" Arnold are about to reduce JuliaSet's monument down to rubble.

I only took the top level.

Enemy soldiers incoming to your monument(s)
An estimated 1964 troops from The Combat Factory (8S) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 2m)
An estimated 0 troops from Monument (1N) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 13m)
An estimated 2 troops from The Combat Factory (8S) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 14m)
An estimated 1 troops from Monument (1N) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 16m)
An estimated 1 troops from The Combat Factory (8S) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 17m)
An estimated 1 troops from Monument (1N) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 19m)
An estimated 3 troops from The Combat Factory (8S) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 20m)
An estimated 1 troops from Monument (1N) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 22m)
An estimated 2 troops from The Combat Factory (8S) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 23m)
An estimated 1 troops from Monument (1N) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 25m)
An estimated 3 troops from The Combat Factory (8S) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 26m)
An estimated 1 troops from Monument (1N) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 27m)
An estimated 0 troops from Monument (1N) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 28m)
An estimated 1 troops from Monument (1N) heading toward Half Dome (0S)! (arrival in 29m)
An estimated 296 troops from [Deleted City] (228N) heading toward [Deleted City] (12S)! (arrival in 38h 17m)
An estimated 399 troops from [Deleted City] (224N) heading toward [Deleted City] (0S)! (arrival in 38h 18m)

Monument is Arnold for those playing along

LOL !!!

:D

Mr Ears
09-20-2009, 04:25 PM
Alright, Tink. The jury has decided. Normally I wanted to wait for 12 votes, as common, but 7 cannot be bested out of 12, so the decision has been made:

The jury has spared you to suffer 2 months in a monument-less exile.

You are redeemed. You can go.

But note - To make sure you don't ever even think of doing this again, one thing I will still do... just as a disciplinary sanction:

Within the next few days, EVERY monument in the nome where you raped the former monuments of JS will be completely leveled to dust. That means, the whole nome 0S, at least every monument holder there, will pay the price for your shameless acts of aggression.

If they ask me questions I will not bother letting them know whose responsibility it is.

Pontius Pilatus
09-20-2009, 04:41 PM
But Mr Ears, innocent bystanders will suffer. Can they escape their fate? Maybe they can pledge they will restrain Tinkerbell in future, so his mischief is checked? Poor souls, they can't help he chose that nome to settle in.

Have pity..........

Please?


Cheers ;)

Ivy
09-20-2009, 05:01 PM
But note - To make sure you don't ever even think of doing this again, one thing I will still do... just as a disciplinary sanction:

Within the next few days, EVERY monument in the nome where you raped the former monuments of JS will be completely leveled to dust. That means, the whole nome 0S, at least every monument holder there, will pay the price for your shameless acts of aggression.

If they ask me questions I will not bother letting them know whose responsibility it is.

Does that include Reed's 2 monuments in 0S nome? He is in vacation mode, same as Juliaset2. Would that not be breaking exactly the same "rule" that you accused Tinkerbell of doing?

Zeal
09-20-2009, 05:05 PM
It's funny how men "lose" themselves while fighting a supposed monster :rolleyes:
Who is the Monster and Who is the Man?

PantherX
09-20-2009, 05:07 PM
Within the next few days, EVERY monument in the nome where you raped the former monuments of JS will be completely leveled to dust. That means, the whole nome 0S, at least every monument holder there, will pay the price for your shameless acts of aggression.


Is this not "Griefing" in it's rawest form? Some would compare this type of punishment to Hitler's actions in WWII.
I have always pitied the homo sapiens that have come up with mass punishment for perceived errors.

This entire thread is stupid and pointless. Unfortunately it is not even a good read as some of the other "I hate tink so you should also" threads started over and over by this same not so bright homo sapien who just won't get it.
What is "it" you may ask???

"No One Cares Anymore™", most never did, some may have started coming on board, but by now... "No One Cares Anymore™ "

Mr Ears
09-20-2009, 05:59 PM
@PantherX... Godwin's Law @ Wikipedia..... (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law) You're out!

@Ivy - Who started the "dirty war"? Who started attacking bystanders who are on vacation? Me? No.... Tink.

@Pontius - The nome is condemned, nothing can change its fate any more... with one exception: Only Tink himself can redeem the people of his nome. By taking one month of exile from holding a monument upon him! Now @Tink... Are you ready to redeem your nomies?

Tinkerbell
09-20-2009, 07:31 PM
Pontius Pilatus

Question

You have been stalking these threads for weeks.

What is your Sabah/Theoris ingame name?

[To Ears] Does that include Reed's 2 monuments in 0S nome? He is in vacation mode, same as Juliaset2. Would that not be breaking exactly the same "rule" that you accused Tinkerbell of doing?

It went over their heads ~ Ears & Pilatus

...historic hypocrisy award 11.6/10...negative score for honesty...both of them...

Haester
09-20-2009, 09:21 PM
Oh so *this* is why I am being attacked. *rolls eyes*

thechris
09-20-2009, 09:29 PM
so attacking inocents will solve this??? good luck with that,
even more people will hate you then mr ears

Tinkerbell
09-20-2009, 10:09 PM
My best guess

Neither Ears nor Arnold have any market activity. Only Ears has ever donated to temple. Together the two accounts compliment each other. Neither has purchased scarabs.

They are multiple accounts. The Puppetmaster is the third account & that one buys scarabs.

In Theoris the "puppetmaster" (what he called him/herself) is sunburn. Sabah is still a mystery.

In her insanity & mindless hatred, abana is the one who gave Ears the JuliaSet excuse & Ears has been using it to make a zillion threads.

sunburn was the one who attacked JuliaSet in June.

Mr Ears
09-21-2009, 04:39 AM
LOL - I can see only one player who ended up holding JuliaSet's monuments (even two of them!!!).... ain't that you, Tink? ;)

Again you inflated a lot of hot air...... absolutely no substance.. nothing worth being discussed really.

Upfront question: By all your mischief, you're the one who is to be held accountable for what is going to happen to your entire nome. Now, you know the conditions. Are you willing to redeem your nome from its fate, or not?

Yes or no.

Ivy
09-21-2009, 05:22 AM
LOL - I can see only one player who ended up holding JuliaSet's monuments (even two of them!!!).... ain't that you, Tink? ;)

Again you inflated a lot of hot air...... absolutely no substance.. nothing worth being discussed really.

Upfront question: By all your mischief, you're the one who is to be held accountable for what is going to happen to your entire nome. Now, you know the conditions. Are you willing to redeem your nome from its fate, or not?

Yes or no.

Seems that Arnold ended up holding JuliaSet's monument, not Tink. The other one disappeared completely so someone must have taken it and then deleted their account or went immortal.

Tinkerbell
09-21-2009, 05:31 AM
Seems that Arnold ended up holding JuliaSet's monument, not Tink. The other one disappeared completely so someone must have taken it and then deleted their account or went immortal.

That was abana. She deleted her account which reduced JuliaSet's monument to rubble. Again, I only took the top level for her to reactivate her account & take it back.

The irony of the situation is just too funny. The two forum posters who claimed to be protecting JuliaSet totally destroyed her monuments ~ reduced them to total rubble.

That is pure evil...

Mr Ears
09-21-2009, 06:16 AM
I only took the top level for her to reactivate her account & take it back.

Do you really believe that anybody here is dumb enough to fall for that?

Tink, Tink, Tink..... tsssssk!

Tinkerbell
09-21-2009, 06:24 AM
Do you really believe that anybody here is dumb enough to fall for that?

Tink, Tink, Tink..... tsssssk!

The proof is in the pudding, Ears. I only sent harrassment attacks at JuliaSet in Theoris ~ Her active account. Again, due to her lies on her CBC forum & in our nome room about me hiring everyone that ever took her monuments. This was also after abana's "team" had reduced both my L5 monuments to rubble.

I could have easily taken one or both if I really wanted too. I could have gone CBC abana on her, since I had been at Immortaliy status for a very loooong time.

I did not.

Guess who I learned the Immortality/delete account exploit from? Yup, another CBC clown. He predicted/threaten that it would soon happen to me. It did! LOL. CBC is the forum that "claims" to be the nicest forum that ever existed. Oh wait, HeavenGames claims that title ~ "Heaven" as in Angels from God. CBC clowns are also HG clowns. There are only a very few of them. They also claim to be the elite. It is another lie. They are nothing more than a common street gang. Like you are.

I am a very proud Little People™. We ruuule, we have Honor & we are hardcore TM fans.

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 01:44 AM
Uh, Ears

Would you care to explain these images

Hmmmm?

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 04:28 AM
You added Arnold to your list of allies?

LOL

Funnier than hell!

:D

Edit: Hey, I noticed one weird thing on the images.... Shortly before your post you have sent 8 spearmen, 5 archers and 8 charioteers off to combat, mission completed in 27 minutes. That means only one thing: You attacked somebody in one of your nomes. Supposedly in 0S. But looking at your profile proofs that you did not win a monument.

Who did you attack and why?

Griefing?

Hmmmmmm?

Edit #2: Wow! Now I even have clear evidence that you definitely attacked somebody in 0S - one of your nomies.
(For those following along who wonder what kind of evidence reveals that - look closely at the images. They provide all the evidence needed to make it a fact)
So, Tink, there can be only 4 monuments that you could have attacked: the middle monument on the right side, or one of the monuments left of the nile. The 2 corner ones on the right side could not have been the targets - they had no defense and would have been taken by you. So the attack you have launched could only hit an innocent bystander.
Now... how would you explain that? Hmmmmm?

thechris
09-22-2009, 06:42 AM
So the attack you have launched could only hit an innocent bystander.
Now... how would you explain that? Hmmmmm?

mr ears, want your plan to hit ALL the monuments in the nome?
its ok if you do it but not tink?

Ivy
09-22-2009, 08:02 AM
Edit: Hey, I noticed one weird thing on the images.... Shortly before your post you have sent 8 spearmen, 5 archers and 8 charioteers off to combat, mission completed in 27 minutes. That means only one thing: You attacked somebody in one of your nomes. Supposedly in 0S. But looking at your profile proofs that you did not win a monument.

Who did you attack and why?

Griefing?

Hmmmmmm?

Edit #2: Wow! Now I even have clear evidence that you definitely attacked somebody in 0S - one of your nomies.
(For those following along who wonder what kind of evidence reveals that - look closely at the images. They provide all the evidence needed to make it a fact)
So, Tink, there can be only 4 monuments that you could have attacked: the middle monument on the right side, or one of the monuments left of the nile. The 2 corner ones on the right side could not have been the targets - they had no defense and would have been taken by you. So the attack you have launched could only hit an innocent bystander.
Now... how would you explain that? Hmmmmm?

Why assume he was attacking a nomemate? Looking at Tink's 3rd picture, there is an empty bandit plot at bottom right, which if I remember correctly was the plot he held up to a few days ago. Much more logical that he took that one.

Also GirlGirl appears to now be a deleted account, as that plot has gone back to bandits. So GirlGirl - from the profile - started on Sep 13, took 2 monuments with one level 1 city and then deleted their account?

Hmmmmm.

Edit: Date was Sep 19 not Sep 13.

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 09:09 AM
For you, Ears. Remember abana's deleted player attack? I'm taking it back again now

Your soldiers currently in-mission
8 5 8 vs [Deleted Player] (0S)! (mission complete in 15m)

Enemy soldiers incoming to your monument(s)
No attacks currently incoming.

You were attacked by [Deleted Player] on 4:05am 09/22/2009
[Deleted Player] sent 102 165 129
You had 0 0 0

Combat Details
[Deleted Player] killed 0 0 0 of your army
You killed 0 0 0 of the enemy army
[Deleted Player] captured 0 0 0 from you!

Result
[Deleted Player] took over the monument plot!

You attacked Bandits on 2:26am 09/22/2009
You sent 8 5 8
Bandits had 0 0 0

Combat Details
You killed 0 0 0 of the enemy army
Bandits killed 0 0 0 of your army
You captured 0 0 0 from Bandits!

Result
You took over the monument plot!

~ ~ ~

By the way, I see you have deleted your multiple account Girls Girl. I had always suspected this is how griefers got rid of their quarry plots/monuments & uncapped themselves. Open an account & build a barracks, get warmats from main account, send one soldier, delete uncapping account. Girls Girl uncapping account was opened 9/19/09 & deleted on 9/21-22/09 while I slept.

You are busted, Ears

You are nothing more than a cheater.

~ ~ ~

Waaay too many exploits in this game, TM.

Lab Complete

thechris
09-22-2009, 09:28 AM
so whats are next expriment?
see if mr ears has big ears?:D

Haester
09-22-2009, 10:29 AM
The worst thing about this game is that I can't attack Mr. Ears' cities and decimate them. He bothered to travel 48 hours with his troops just because I [unknowingly, mind you] created my second city in Tink's nome. I'd attack his one monument, but it's my old one with pretty much nothing left.

WHY CAN'T I GET REVENGE?!!!

I'm a civilian here, folks. Ears, it seems like you should really be sending me a gift basket or something to apologize since I don't know you or Tink other than what I've seen on the forums.

abana
09-22-2009, 11:47 AM
Doesn't make much sense, does it. Probably about as much sense as Tink attacking Juliaaset because I attacked him.

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 11:58 AM
Doesn't make much sense, does it. Probably about as much sense as Tink attacking Juliaaset because I attacked him.

Your credibility is totally destroyed

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 12:00 PM
@Tink: So I'm busted, huuuh? Do you really think your posted garbage makes me being busted?

Nothing of it is true, Tinkie! I don't even know her! The girl might well be a friend of Arnold's, certainly not mine. Though I have to admit, her help comes right handy. Cause I admittedly need Arnold's support in my ventures.

And there's AGAIN a double standard..... Tink = yesterday so, today else :D
Yesterday (only weeks ago) you pled that the attack cap when holding 2 monuments has to fall.... and today?? Now, folks... it's Tink... what would you expect? ;) Today, of course, a third person helping one of his enemies to free himself out his bonds IS AN EXPLOIT! LOL! AGAIN... such a HUGE double standard!

And one more thing for you to think about, Tink! You still know about the trial, don't you? Yes, you have been released by the jury. True. But I also briefed you about the one disciplinary sanction that has been imposed on you. And about the conditions.

The fate of the 0S nome where JuliaSet's ruins lie lies in your hands. BUT: Taking back the monument will NOT redeem your neighbors from your sins - it is dooming them! You take back the monument, Tink => Every monument holder in the nome will pay the penalty on your account!

I'm giving you one last day to accept the sanction conditions unconditionally! You better make a wise decision...


@ Haester.... don't "thank" me... "thank" Tink. I agree, he really ought to send you a gift basket to apologize. But ask HIM, not me. Never forget, HE is the aggressor, who unleashed the landslide of terror.

And he is the only one to stop it. It all depends on him wanting peace or refusing. He has to accept the mild sanction that has been imposed on him (once again: for cowardly taking 2 monuments from an innocent player who on top could not answer back because she was on vacation).

And, dear Haester, yes you lost a monument. But also don't forget, it still can get much worse. MUCH worse...

thechris
09-22-2009, 12:14 PM
who needs some bronze to fight mr ears?:D

thechris
09-22-2009, 01:24 PM
WAIT let me get this striaght, you going to destroy all the monuments in 0s
right?
QUESTION 1
how does that make you any better then tink?(lets just say tink did it for now)
QUESTION 2
isnt juliaset inmortal?
QUESTION 3
do you like pie?
QUESTION 4
how does juliaset like what your doing?
QUESTION 5
how does the public like what your doing?(i think your alone on this one)
QUESTION 6
why didnt i use smilies?
QUESTION 7
arnt you going to waste a lot of warmats to get all these monuments from the high rank players?


plz answer all the questions before you do something stupid mr ears

Pontius Pilatus
09-22-2009, 01:55 PM
The seven questions, just as poetic as the seven sins or the seven veils.
I wonder about the pie though, is it just in to complete the seven?


Cheers!

thechris
09-22-2009, 02:11 PM
lol didnt relize that untill now:eek:
the pie was becasue i couldnt think of anything at the time
i just couldnt think of more questions

Pontius Pilatus
09-22-2009, 02:20 PM
You meant ofcourse the humble pie.



No, I don't think Mr Ears is the type, but he wants to serve it to your master though.


Cheers!

thechris
09-22-2009, 02:25 PM
i just relized i put pi as 3 lol

edit: why dont you use smilies?

Jeff Fiske
09-22-2009, 03:30 PM
@Tink: So I'm busted, huuuh? Do you really think your posted garbage makes me being busted?

Nothing of it is true, Tinkie! I don't even know her! The girl might well be a friend of Arnold's, certainly not mine. Though I have to admit, her help comes right handy. Cause I admittedly need Arnold's support in my ventures.

And there's AGAIN a double standard..... Tink = yesterday so, today else :D
Yesterday (only weeks ago) you pled that the attack cap when holding 2 monuments has to fall.... and today?? Now, folks... it's Tink... what would you expect? ;) Today, of course, a third person helping one of his enemies to free himself out his bonds IS AN EXPLOIT! LOL! AGAIN... such a HUGE double standard!

And one more thing for you to think about, Tink! You still know about the trial, don't you? Yes, you have been released by the jury. True. But I also briefed you about the one disciplinary sanction that has been imposed on you. And about the conditions.

The fate of the 0S nome where JuliaSet's ruins lie lies in your hands. BUT: Taking back the monument will NOT redeem your neighbors from your sins - it is dooming them! You take back the monument, Tink => Every monument holder in the nome will pay the penalty on your account!

I'm giving you one last day to accept the sanction conditions unconditionally! You better make a wise decision...


@ Haester.... don't "thank" me... "thank" Tink. I agree, he really ought to send you a gift basket to apologize. But ask HIM, not me. Never forget, HE is the aggressor, who unleashed the landslide of terror.

And he is the only one to stop it. It all depends on him wanting peace or refusing. He has to accept the mild sanction that has been imposed on him (once again: for cowardly taking 2 monuments from an innocent player who on top could not answer back because she was on vacation).

And, dear Haester, yes you lost a monument. But also don't forget, it still can get much worse. MUCH worse...

Ears, you are in danger of being on a much more serious panel.

Tink is smart enough to realize that this is entertaining soap opera for many to read, but and while in many ways he deserves some level of poking and prodding for his posts- nobody deserves such blatent organized attacks that you could call harrasment.

See, in general, we very much rely on this sort of calling each other out on the forums to keep nasty behavior in check and so we can find out who the trolls and griefers are. The problem is there have been way too many false accusations and shady activity surrounding the people attacking Tink, many who are doing so with malace not understanding that drama is what makes Tink so special on our forums.

Personally, I think this poll and mock trial goes too far and borders on harassment- particularly for new players who might think this kind of behavior is okay. As long as Tink is having fun with it, and so are the rest of you, I don't mind letting it go on as it is entertianing on some levels. I don't want to create some special immunity bubble around Tink, and niether does he.

But I don't think anyone wants someone creating accounts to create an army to attack and then deleting that account. Very lame.

If you want to pick on eachother, do it strait up and try and find a new topic to bicker about.

No, Tink did not ask me to intervene here, in case you were wondering.

thechris
09-22-2009, 03:32 PM
YAY go jeff!! WHOO


:D


edit: jeff your post is black and white, and some smilies! :D

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 05:38 PM
Ears, you are in danger of being on a much more serious panel.

Tink is smart enough to realize that this is entertaining soap opera for many to read, but and while in many ways he deserves some level of poking and prodding for his posts- nobody deserves such blatent organized attacks that you could call harrasment.

See, in general, we very much rely on this sort of calling each other out on the forums to keep nasty behavior in check and so we can find out who the trolls and griefers are. The problem is there have been way too many false accusations and shady activity surrounding the people attacking Tink, many who are doing so with malace not understanding that drama is what makes Tink so special on our forums.

Personally, I think this poll and mock trial goes too far and borders on harassment- particularly for new players who might think this kind of behavior is okay. As long as Tink is having fun with it, and so are the rest of you, I don't mind letting it go on as it is entertianing on some levels. I don't want to create some special immunity bubble around Tink, and niether does he.

But I don't think anyone wants someone creating accounts to create an army to attack and then deleting that account. Very lame.

If you want to pick on eachother, do it strait up and try and find a new topic to bicker about.

No, Tink did not ask me to intervene here, in case you were wondering.

You have just saved the nome... ;)

No, sincerely, I think it's time for a little explanation.

The mock trial, the bragging threads... at the end of the day, there's just one person here who took them serious: Tink himself. And maybe some others, remarkably those who feel connected to his side. Interesting observation whatsoever.

For me, and some people here I connected with, all of this was just great fun. For me personally, it was the only fun I have playing the game. Don't get me wrong... the basic idea, the structure of the game are almost perfect - the design has only one huge weakness: The direct competition / PvP dilemma.

Okay, the game gives you lots of competing options: to build nicer cities... to build them faster..... to build more boats..... to have more goods to offer.... whatever. But it does not give you the option to challenge your power directly against your competitor. There is _absolutely_ no PvP! Yeah, I know you will say, there is PvP and everyone can fight over monument plots bla bla bla... Not! You do that twice, then your PvP is over, and most likely over forever! Absolutely no option to challenge your power against the power of other players in a direct way! Dear Jeff, with an option to arm wrestle this would be the best game ever designed. Without it, as it is now, it lacks one essential function: to really challenge the player.

So you see? I missed being challenged so much that I had to build my own PvP scenario. Because: The game does not provide one, period. And I chose a PvP scenario against someone who has been shouting for more PvP all way long thru the forum walls... everybody here could witness it (and what a pathetic irony... now the same person is whining about it... what da hell :confused: :p ) So at the end of the day, it was easy to build purposes against Tink.... his alleged love of PvP.... JuliaSet.... CBC....

The military operations ingame... the verbal clash in the forum.... it all was just part of the game. I didn't take any of these threads serious.... just part of a PvP challenge that had to be created artificially, as this game, while providing all the other requirements for a fantastic game experience, does not provide it.

(As I said in a recent post: Ingame, I'm a really mean, trigger happy person, but in real life, I'm just a nice guy. Unlike ingame, where I'm a chess player type always besting the competing players by all means) :D

So, let's conclude here. I would be extremely interested to know where this game is headed, to decide either to stay or to leave in the long term. Do you want to attract comfortable people, who found the game to be their kind of escape from their worries and ideally want to play it without worrying about anything, without mental challenges, and intend to enjoy a living-happily-ever-after-ingame-existance? In other words, who long for the design as it is now?

Or do you want to attract players who enjoy to be challenged?

So at the end of the day I really have one essential question: What is your solution to the PvP dilemma?

What is your solution to implement challenge?

Thanks!

@Tink: Be a good sport, buddy ;)
Never had hard feelings toward you, I told you many times... A pitty you never believed me... /sigh
Like you said... the proof's in the pudding.... I never called you names in my texts.... you did. /sigh
One more thing.... it's very honorable of Jeff to protect you in his last sentence.... very professional, too. But one thing is as sure as we all know that water is wet: someone ran to him and lamented and whined... big time!
And I just know who this was, Tink... sooo obvious ;)
Probably you're a pleasant person, and I can only repeat, I don't have any hard feelings..... but now you will always have to live with that tag to have run to the forum mum and cried in her chest.... not something you ought to be too proud about, no? :D
Take it with humor, man.

:)

Cheers,
Ears

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 05:43 PM
Who's whining, Ears?

You have totally missed the point

AGAIN

Mano-a-mano

Bring it on!

:D

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 06:12 PM
You now have to live with that stigma, Tink. I said you are probably a nice person overall, but you can't help it anymore, you will always be the guy who needed to call his mom because he couldn't beat his rival.

;)


Mano-a-mano?

You know, that ain't possible in this game. You know as well as I do, that Nile Online is lacking a mano-a-mano option.

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 06:18 PM
Mano-a-mano?

You know, that ain't possible in this game. You know as well as I do, that Nile Online is lacking a mano-a-mano option.

Build some monuments like I did.

Buy some scarabs.

Play honestly.

...leaves out the Honor part, cuz you are not qualified...

Plenty of PvP in this game. I am living proof of it.

LOL !!!

:D

thechris
09-22-2009, 06:22 PM
you guys could always play ikariam, thats how i solved the PvP delima:eek:
you can raid the enemy untill they have no resorces and there updating:eek:
(unlike some game i know)
so there PvP sesteam is even better!:D
you should try it, its a lot of fun

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 06:23 PM
Build some monuments like I did.

Buy some scarabs.

Play honestly.

Plenty of PvP in this game. I am living proof of it.

LOL !!!

:D

Ok... let's say I'd build 2 monuments.... and then?

PvP? None! Arm wrestling with others? None! Challenge? None!

Or is there something I miss? How would your mano-a-mano look like? Explain.

Build some monuments like I did.

Uhm, building monuments IS NOT PvP, by the way.

You have never PvPed. You don't even know to PvP. Cut that crap.

And by the way, I am a supporter in Theoris. So you better stop that bull**** about me right here, or I'll have a legitimate purpose to start going against you on my terms again.

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 06:36 PM
Your problem, Ears, is that you are a coward.

You refuse to enter into the PvP part of the game, cuz you refuse to build monuments. You stay under your rock & play a one-sided game from the safety of your cities & get help from your puppetmaster while cheating like hell.

Don't got the stuff to put yourself at risk?

No, you don't.

And by the way, I am a supporter in Theoris. So you better stop that bull**** about me right here, or I'll have a legitimate purpose to start going against you on my terms again.

Thankx for finally admitting it sunburn. You will soon be getting a new neighbor in Theoris. My 2nd plants tomorrow.

...to be continued...

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 06:48 PM
Your problem, Ears, is that you are a coward.

You refuse to enter into the PvP part of the game, cuz you refuse to build monuments. You stay under your rock & play a one-sided game from the safety of your cities & get help from your puppetmaster while cheating like hell.

Don't got the stuff to put yourself at risk?

No, you don't.

Okay. You're saying you enter the PvP part of the game by building monuments.

I'm saying, you exit the nonexistant PvP part of the game by having 2 monument plots.

You have to admit that I'm right. To be right yourself, you have to explain what kind of entrance to PvP this is to lose the ability to attack. Explain yourself.

As long as it remains unexplained, you're the coward. Cause you exit the PvP part in my eyes.

And by the way, you have lost every single battle that has been fought. So you better have good arguments when you tell me something about PvP.

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 06:52 PM
And by the way, you have lost every single battle that has been fought.

You were attacked by Mr Ears on 5:42pm 09/02/2009
Mr Ears sent 136 72 134
You had 122 86 149

Combat Details
Mr Ears killed 56 86 42 of your army
You killed 111 72 59 of the enemy army
You captured 12 0 17 from Mr Ears!

Result
You kept the monument!

~ ~ ~

You were attacked by Mr Ears on 6:48pm 09/03/2009
Mr Ears sent 139 95 197
You had 175 114 204

Combat Details
Mr Ears killed 82 114 60 of your army
You killed 139 93 112 of the enemy army
You captured 0 2 4 from Mr Ears!

Result
You kept the monument!

~ ~ ~

You were attacked by Mr Ears on 1:21am 09/06/2009
Mr Ears sent 125 85 120
You had 154 124 242

Combat Details
Mr Ears killed 54 124 45 of your army
You killed 109 85 105 of the enemy army
You captured 16 0 15 from Mr Ears!

Result
You kept the monument!

~ ~ ~

Try honesty, Ears. Get an adult to help

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 06:54 PM
Thankx for finally admitting it sunburn. You will soon be getting a new neighbor in Theoris. My 2nd plants tomorrow.

...to be continued...

Yay! :D

Nobody will ever be able to take my monuments. Nobody! I have a defense strategy that nobody can best.

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 07:00 PM
Yay! :D

Nobody will ever be able to take my monuments. Nobody! I have a defense strategy that nobody can best.

We will find out, won't we?

:D

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 07:00 PM
Oh..... Tink! Ts, ts, ts.....

These attacks were SUPPOSED to fail.

These Sabah attacks were only initiated to sidetrack you from the real one that was planned in Theoris. Abana was informed about this whole plot and the purpose of the above attacks. She can confirm that.

And it turned out a huge success.... C'mon Tink...... You gotta admit it was an ingenious strategy :) C'mon... laud me... only once :D

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 07:05 PM
Oh..... Tink! Ts, ts, ts.....

These attacks were SUPPOSED to fail.

These Sabah attacks were only initiated to sidetrack you from the real one that was planned in Theoris. Abana was informed about this whole plot and the purpose of the above attacks. She can confirm that.

And it turned out a huge success.... C'mon Tink...... You gotta admit it was an ingenious strategy :) C'mon... laud me... only once :D

LOL !!!

Thank You, again for fingering abana in public!

:D

Mr Ears
09-22-2009, 07:41 PM
We will find out, won't we?

:D

Is Tink wanting to scare me?

LOL !!!!

If you manage to take one of my monuments, I will give you 100,000 goods of your choice.

:D

As opposed to you, I am willing to defend them. And I will keep them.

thechris
09-22-2009, 07:59 PM
thats a good offer, tink take all 100k lux :D

Tinkerbell
09-22-2009, 08:05 PM
If you manage to take one of my monuments, I will give you 100,000 goods of your choice.

I don't like gifts. That's your game.

Jeff Fiske
09-23-2009, 08:23 AM
A few thoughts.

For those of you who seem to have forgotten, or are new, much of this is Drama for Drama's sake.

Glad to know you are both in the same boat, in terms of having fun. Problem is some people think you really are gunning for each other, and now there is some 'splash damage' going on. Going after each other is great. Taking out all monuments in a Nome because of one person in it is not cool. Good way to drive off new players who have no idea what is going on. Now if everyone in a Nome was against everyone in another Nome, that would be a different story.

Tink would never ask for help, especially from us. Matter a fact, if he was offered it, he would refuse and he probably finds it irritating that I am seeming to support him in any way. (It interferes with his Robin Hood or lone wolf personna.)

Perhaps the PVP element of the game is in fact, this forum?

abana
09-23-2009, 08:57 AM
But going after all monuments in a Nome is using the same rationale that Tink used to justify taking Juliaset's monument because I attacked him. It is making one player(Tink/me) resposible for the safety of other's monuments. It is holding those players hostage.

Tinkerbell
09-23-2009, 09:46 AM
<sigh>

But going after all monuments in a Nome is using the same rationale that Tink used to justify taking Juliaset's monument because I attacked him.

For the zillionth time, abana

NO

I harrassed attacked JuliaSet in her ACTIVE Theoris account, but never took her monuments there (cuz I am NOT a griefer like YOU are), cuz of her lies on her forum AND especially in our Theoris capital nome room AND she had renamed her Theoris monuments to Tink's Targets I & II. All lies. She never retracted her lies, so she made her bed. JuliaSet knew the solution, but refused to take it. Correct her lies. She had her chance.

I took her Sabah II monuments for two reasons

1) Her account had been abandoned
2) She was abusing vacation mode

AND

3) Your "team" attacks finally uncapped me to do it :D

It was a continuation of Theoris between JuliaSet & me. In private.

You & Ears (and your "teams") reduced JuliaSet's monuments to rubble. I only took one level.

YOU, Ears, Amun Nefer are the ones who KEEP bringing it to THIS forum, forcing me to reply each time so those reading your lies will know the truth.

You know what is really funny, abana? You deleted your Sabah account & didn't reach Immortality, just to grief me. My Sabah II rank is almost back to where it was before & I have no monument rank bonus at all right now.

As you found out in Theoris when your mindless hatred caused your Immortality rank to fall out of the top 100, while I retired at rank 19

I won!

If you need lesssons on how to play Nile, I will be glad to help! Read any of my forum help posts. It is why I make them. There is much more to mastering this game besides PvP. I play a defensive PvP game. My goals are always Quad 22s & 1500 boats followed by Immortality & a restart, not griefing. I am One with the Game, cuz this is what we got.

...and I absolutely DO love this game...it is the COTN II that I have always begged TM for...and it has exceeded my wildest imagination in its greatness...

:D

Tink would never ask for help, especially from us. Matter a fact, if he was offered it, he would refuse and he probably finds it irritating that I am seeming to support him in any way. (It interferes with his Robin Hood or lone wolf personna.)

Dat's a fact, Jack!

...now about those Quests?...<begs again>...

:)

abana
09-23-2009, 10:34 AM
I am keeping a promise I made to JuliaSet on day one of Theoris, when we both ended up in the same nome.

Any attack on me by one of her CBC drones, would be considered an attack by JuliaSet personally.

Promises made ~ Promises kept

Who are you to say that she was abusing vacation mode?

I didn't delete to grief you, I had some things going on in real life, and expected to loose frequent internet access. I also was fed up with your postings on the Nome wall.

I watched my rank in Theoris, it wasn't the loss of monuments that caused the drop, a ranking period passed, and no drop. In my last hours, I gave away all of my excess goods, that is what caused it to drop. And I DON'T CARE!

Reading your posts tell anyone how NOT to play.

Tinkerbell
09-23-2009, 11:14 AM
That post was one of mah Greatest Hitz, abana! Thank you for reposting it!

:D

How psycho of me to predict what JuliaSet would have you do sooo many months later. She made what we call in politics, a "whistle post". It allows the maker to "appear" to stay above the fray, while calling her drones to arms.

That entire thread on her forum was to alert the CBC forum to deal with her imaginary attackers (of which there was only ever a very few) to "defend her". I was never one of her attackers. Then her lie post in that thread. You fell for it like you do all the mindless gossip.

You are a CBC Moderator?

____ Yes

____ No

You are also a CBC drone & forum clown.

Mr Ears
09-23-2009, 11:19 AM
There is much more to mastering this game besides PvP. I play a defensive PvP game. My goals are always Quad 22s & 1500 boats followed by Immortality & a restart, not griefing. I am One with the Game, cuz this is what we got.

But this is not good enough! And the tragic thing is, it could so easily be fixed: Either...
...the monument cap could be removed
...OR an option could be implemented TO GET RID OF YOUR MONUMENTS
...OR the monument cap could stay, but the ability to attack has to stay enabled, even if you have 2 monuments.
Either one of them would fix the last big problems this game has.

Yes, Tink, I do have a problem in Sabah that you cannot retaliate. And don't come with this "I've won the monuments back right after the attacks" bulls/hit. That's ridiculous. What I mean is, I am having my own monuments that I built with my own hands, they are the ones you would have to go after for retaliation. But you can't. Because you have 2 monuments. And of course I don't have my own monuments in the first place. Because if I would, there even wouldn't be any reason for you to retaliate, because I wouldn't have attacked you.

I can't believe this game has such a stupid bug!

And about your goals.... your goals are ABSOLUTELY NO CHALLENGE! Or is something a challenge that comes automatically with time? LOL! No way! Sorry Tink, but you're playing a bored people's game.

Where are some unexpected sinks that would give you something to think about? Where is a PvP aspect that always keeps you watchful? And it would be so easy to implement these elements! Unbelievable that TM doesn't consider doing something!

Okay, one more thing:

Perhaps the PVP element of the game is in fact, this forum?

I hope you're not being serious here. This means that you would outsource the vital element of challenge and PvP from ingame to outgame. Actually it is like that. So is that your intention of PvP for Nile Online? Verbal PvP ONLY?

Okay, here's a clear suggestion to fix the lacking ingame challenge and nonexistant PvP:

Why don't you provide the option to stay able to attack, even if you already hold 2 monuments (or completely remove the 2 monument cap; or an option to get rid of monuments you don't want to have any more) just as you handled it with the ability to build monuments? ====>>> Pay 10 scarabs and your hands are untied!

It would be that simple! It's only the question, if you're intending to fix the PvP dilemma. It's all about if you want it or not.

I really would be extremely interested in hearing your statement about it.

Don't you think that this would attract more paying players?

Tinkerbell
09-23-2009, 11:25 AM
Good Morning, Ears/sunburn. You have a new neighbor in Theoris II this morning. My shovel has been planted.

:D

My Sabah II rank this morning is 213. Yours is a pitiful 550.

Your Sabah account needs work. A lot of it. Buying scarabs "might" help. ;)

abana
09-23-2009, 11:38 AM
Juliaset did NOT manipulate me in any way to do what I did, and I strongly resent your implying otherwise.

She was not in any way trying to get others to defend her, you just don't understand friendship(wonder why).

Yes, I am a CBC moderator, I make no secret of it, nor does the forum. Why do you have such a problem with it?

The only way that I have used any of my moderator privileges, is that I have posted in the private forums(most have to do with planning for upcoming contests), do you have a problem with that?

I have deleted advertising posts, is there something wrong with that?

And I have downloaded entries for contests where I am part of the judging team, is that problematical?

Mr Ears
09-23-2009, 12:26 PM
Good Morning, Ears/sunburn. You have a new neighbor in Theoris II this morning. My shovel has been planted.

:D

Hi @Tink!

A baby bronze city? I'm not sure if the location was the right decision... ^^

You can send your people..... I will "welcome" them :D

I will not lose a single monument. You're lacking a strategic mind to beat me in that.

Tinkerbell
09-23-2009, 12:37 PM
:D

Hi @Tink!

A baby bronze city? I'm not sure if the location was the right decision... ^^

You might move your monuments, so I am exactly between your Capital & 2nd city. Three hours attack distance from each city & your current two monuments.

:D

Mr Ears
09-23-2009, 01:14 PM
You might move your monuments, so I am exactly between your Capital & 2nd city. Three hours attack distance from each city & your current two monuments.

:D

Move my monuments? :confused: No way I move my monuments, just cause there's a danger around.

I always play like they are in immediate danger anyway.

I am organizing a defense that is superior, it's that plain and simple.

I will not lose my monuments, period.

Tinkerbell
09-23-2009, 01:19 PM
Move my monuments? :confused: No way I move my monuments, just cause there's a danger around.

Well, when I take them you might change your mind. ;)

Mr Ears
09-23-2009, 01:24 PM
Sweet, Tink. Very sweet :D

Then you will soon learn that you don't have the slightest chance :p


By the way: why don't you tell Jeff that I'm right about the PvP issue having to be fixed?

I think there's an opportunity here to tell him about your suggestions for this issue, which are pretty much the same as mine.

Tinkerbell
09-23-2009, 01:27 PM
Sweet, Tink. Very sweet :D

Then you will soon learn that you don't have the slightest chance :p

Uh huh

By the way: why don't you tell Jeff that I'm right about the PvP issue having to be fixed?

I think there's an opportunity here to tell him about your suggestions for this issue, which are pretty much the same as mine.

TM knows my feelings & the game is complete. Win some ~ lose some.

I want Quests. Everyone wants Quests. They are much more important for TM to be spending their precious programming time on.

Mr Ears
09-23-2009, 01:36 PM
TM knows my feelings & the game is complete. Win some ~ lose some.

I want Quests. Everyone wants Quests. They are much more important for TM to be spending their precious programming time on.

But I don't think it requires a too big deal of working time to modify the monument rules.

You know as well as I do that PvP is in a dead end. So should they leave it there? Again, without challenge the game is not complete.

Tinkerbell
09-23-2009, 02:19 PM
But I don't think it requires a too big deal of working time to modify the monument rules.

You know as well as I do that PvP is in a dead end. So should they leave it there? Again, without challenge the game is not complete.

Quests will provide more challenge & the game has plenty of challange already. You just need to stop cheating.

You have already proven that you do not give a damn about the peaceful players. You did this with your threat to wipe out the entire nome (something you cannot do, by the way).

I care about the peaceful players. I care about them a LOT.

Mr Ears
09-23-2009, 04:02 PM
Quests will provide more challenge & the game has plenty of challange already. You just need to stop cheating.

You have already proven that you do not give a damn about the peaceful players. You did this with your threat to wipe out the entire nome (something you cannot do, by the way).

I care about the peaceful players. I care about them a LOT.

You know, Tink.... all that came from you regarding this subject sounded totally different some weeks ago.... before you were under attack yourself.

Then you were the one who was attacked, and you started complaining, and suddenly PvP is none of importance anymore, and suddenly it's all about the peaceful players and all about continuing what can be called a bored people's game.

You continue to change colors like a mad chameleon. You're a double standard guy.

You say there's plenty of challenge in the game? Strange only that you can't name one. Well, you named getting to level 22 and building a lot of ships. I made clear that things like these that come automatically with time cannot be considered as challenges.

The game does not have a challenge. The game is for bored people. Period.

It could be fixed easily. Period.

If I give a damn about peaceful players or not doesn't matter at all. Playing my game, I do my thing. Plus wanna do it better than the rest. So should do everyone who plays a game. Playing a game means wanting to win. So who gives a damn about peaceful players or bloodthirsty players or whatever bulls/hit... => Only hypocrites. People like you........question mark?

Tinkerbell
09-23-2009, 04:18 PM
You & abana are two very good examples why TM has the two plot cap.

Blame yourself. You both are warmongers w/o Honor.

Amun Nefer
09-23-2009, 05:13 PM
http://images.encyclopediadramatica.com/images/1/13/Ohthedramaold.png

Mr Ears
09-23-2009, 05:13 PM
You & abana are two very good examples why TM has the two plot cap.

Blame yourself. You both are warmongers w/o Honor.

So we can outline that you oppose PvP today.

Now that's remarkable. Before yourself were hit, you used to state the exact opposite.

And everybody following the forum can confirm that.

Now it's proven: Your an opportunistic chameleon.

So.... how does it feel to be a chameleon, Tink? Oh... let me add.... a chameleon who will never win a monument that I hold?

:D

Haester
09-23-2009, 07:35 PM
Again, I couldn't give a crap about all this drama. I'm just annoyed that my low-key way of playing the game has now turned into some sort of involvement with your idiotic drama. I don't care whether Tink or Ears is right. I don't care whether you're both wrong. I'm just annoyed that I have to go through the damned tedium of rebuilding my monument, and letting my rank slide. There are tons of PvP games, and any aspects of that that Nile has are kind of broken -- someone who goes around attacking and abandoning is not really attackable.

I guess my real beef is with the game design -- either auto-detect stupid monument trolling and boot players, or allow for actual battle.

joshofet
09-24-2009, 03:31 AM
I gather that you are caught in the pointless fighting over monuments Haester, as an innocent bystander. That is unfortunate, but little can be done about it. You can raise your defenses, or accept the temporary loss and rebuild, or join the club and start marauding yourself. It's not what you like best, but what you hate least I guess. :cool:

No game can be designed in a way that there is no possibility of using the rules such that (a large) part of the players will see it as foul play. New rules will only shift the playing field. The less competitive the game, the less the chance of that happening, but I've seen players cheat at solitaire ;)

Mr Ears
09-24-2009, 05:57 AM
@Haester... What's your problem? :)

Mr Ears
09-24-2009, 08:53 AM
@Tink:

25 ships carrying 500 [cedar] , 1000 [leather] , 500 [baskets] , 500 [pottery] en route to Dat's a Fact Jack (arrival in 38m [6:26 am])

Tinkerbell
09-24-2009, 09:20 AM
Good Morning, Ears/sunburn!

Those gifts were worse than taking my monuments. Aaaarrrgggghhh! :p

I'm building a market & gonna sell them, cuz I need the bread. So there

:D

EDIT: You also redlined my pottery & baskets shops causing me unemployed. Sucks! :p

LOL !!!

...hate unemployed... absolutely HATE em...

Mr Ears
09-24-2009, 09:43 AM
Good Morning, Ears/sunburn!

I'm building a market & gonna sell them, cuz I need the bread.

50 ships carrying 5000 [bread] en route to Dat's a Fact Jack (arrival in 49m [11:30 am])

Tinkerbell
09-24-2009, 09:45 AM
50 ships carrying 5000 [bread] en route to Dat's a Fact Jack (arrival in 49m [11:30 am])

... :p ...

...one each basic Theoris II account...forever tainted...<curses>...

Haester
09-24-2009, 03:46 PM
@Haester... What's your problem?

Umm... that there's no way to kick your ass. Especially since this is apparently some kind of Sabah pissing contest, and I'm hanging out in Theoris.

Mr Ears
09-24-2009, 04:06 PM
Hi @Haester!

Indeed I have arranged attacks on both of your monuments. I have hired one of my partners to do this for me, because I couldn't do it myself unfortunately because I hold 2 monuments (stupid rule!).

And actually these attacks don't have anything to do with the Sabah ongoings, nor because of Tink. They were because of you. Think about how you play, what you do and who you disturb with your actions. Not only I, but also some of my neighbors got very annoyed at a point. Think about it!

By the way, if you feel like kicking my as/s, you're very welcome to try.... you find my monuments in 118N and 124N.

Good luck!

LOL!

If you also wanna kick Tink's as/s, you're also welcome to challenge his monument in 112S in Theoris.

Mr Ears
09-24-2009, 06:07 PM
10 ships carrying 1000 [clay] en route to Dat's a Fact Jack (arrival in 43m [7:48 pm])

That's what you get for wanting my monuments :D

Tinkerbell
09-24-2009, 06:08 PM
[To Haester]By the way, if you feel like kicking my as/s, you're very welcome to try.... you find my monuments in 118N and 124N.

Dat's mah job!

Bet on it

:D

Haester
09-25-2009, 03:29 PM
And actually these attacks don't have anything to do with the Sabah ongoings, nor because of Tink. They were because of you. Think about how you play, what you do and who you disturb with your actions.

Really? I'm curious what I could possibly have done to disturb anyone. I mostly keep to myself, and sometimes do fair trades on the wall. I also contribute a lot to the gods, which seems like my nomemates might appreciate!

Haester
09-25-2009, 03:47 PM
Haha I just checked my nomechat for the first time in a while -- why didn't you just message me in-game to ask me to stop making donations? This **** is so passive-aggressive and laaame!

Mr Ears
09-25-2009, 04:09 PM
I'll arrange attacks on anyone who donates unreasonably.

Too high donations only reveal that the donator is too wealthy and has too little worries.

But now things are solved... You're still invited to give me a visit @ my monuments :D

P.S: I just canceled an operation that was already being in preparation ^^

joshofet
09-25-2009, 04:42 PM
This game definitely needs more clowns, cheers Mr Ears! :cool:

Mr Ears
09-26-2009, 07:31 PM
How cute! Two spies :rolleyes:

2 ships carrying 200 [clay] en route to Dat's a Fact Jack (arrival in 49m [9:15 pm])

lynnk
09-28-2009, 10:42 AM
Ok... let's say I'd build 2 monuments.... and then?

PvP? None! Arm wrestling with others? None! Challenge? None!

Or is there something I miss? How would your mano-a-mano look like? Explain.



Uhm, building monuments IS NOT PvP, by the way.

You have never PvPed. You don't even know to PvP. Cut that crap.

And by the way, I am a supporter in Theoris. So you better stop that bull**** about me right here, or I'll have a legitimate purpose to start going against you on my terms again.

Reading through this thread - I guess you do not have any abilities that enable you to play chess or any other game where people battle cerebrally rather than use brute force and violence - or any ability to debate....

.... and I guess there would be no point in me explaining that the most powerful people on the planet never get to the top by using brute force - they manage to show their superiority [ie top ranker status] over the rest of us without blowing up and/or stealing other people's property....

Bashing somebody until they submit does not mean that the bully is the better person - just thought I'd mention that;)

lynnk
09-28-2009, 10:59 AM
But this is not good enough! And the tragic thing is, it could so easily be fixed:
[snip]
Don't you think that this would attract more paying players?

I think that anybody who wants to play a PvP game plays Ikariam or any other of those sorts of games where the long-term players just grief and bully the new ones... who cannot do anything about it at all....

I think that if players who grief others were removed and their IP addresses were blocked and nobody could use a proxy to play this game - then I think that a lot more people would play this game....

I know that there are many more people on the planet who prefer non-violence and co-operation with others than who prefer bullying domination violence or terrorism... there are more people who prefer to compete with one another in sportsmanlike ways than there are people who prefer to compete by having bar-room brawls etc etc etc....

Pontius Pilatus
09-28-2009, 01:17 PM
I have played this game hoping I could get by cooperating with others to the goals, thing is only one out of ten wants to cooperate. You have to be lucky if one is near you. I had cooperating players almost always 24 hrs away, is that ideal, no. I have several times tried to make it easier and cooperate with my own neighbours. I was one time lucky, but in all other instances I just got nothing back or even just hostility. You can frickle my dickle, this game sucks as it is. No incentive at all for cooperation, just egotistic trading and marketplay. No incentive at all for PvP either. This game is for vegetables, just running the upgrades until we finish the season and go for the harvest(immortality).

Cheers!

Mr Ears
09-28-2009, 05:51 PM
this game sucks as it is. No incentive at all for cooperation, just egotistic trading and marketplay. No incentive at all for PvP either. This game is for vegetables, just running the upgrades until we finish the season and go for the harvest(immortality).

Word.

I think that if players who grief others were removed and their IP addresses were blocked and nobody could use a proxy to play this game - then I think that a lot more people would play this game....

You think there are a lot of tired bored people out there who would enjoy this kind of gameplay and would actually create an account?

This is a game for tired people who like to avoid being challenged. All your building comes automatically with time, you have nothing to do for it but wait. It's a tired bored people's game as it is, no action, no challenge at all. It could be fixed so easily, the magic word is PvP.

Pontius Pilatus
09-28-2009, 10:55 PM
Talking about ears, hey Mr Ears the bronze, leather and cedar will overflow from my warehouses soon. Let's find a purpose for the stuff. You must have a list of targets, PM me. ;)

Mr Ears
09-29-2009, 06:59 AM
:D

You're talking to the right person.

iCat
09-29-2009, 08:19 AM
Just want to ask Mr Ears and Pontius Pilatus, if they think this game is for vegetables, no challenge, boring, etc., why do they still play? Why not just quit and do something better with your time?

Tinkerbell
09-29-2009, 08:29 AM
Just want to ask Mr Ears and Pontius Pilatus, if they think this game is for vegetables, no challenge, boring, etc., why do they still play? Why not just quit and do something better with your time?

And why do they need help from others? Cannot do it without a team/multiple accounts?

Sounds like they have failed the Challenge Test™ to me.

Pontius Pilatus
09-29-2009, 09:41 AM
Just want to ask Mr Ears and Pontius Pilatus, if they think this game is for vegetables, no challenge, boring, etc., why do they still play? Why not just quit and do something better with your time?


I want to eat you all. ;)

Pontius Pilatus
09-29-2009, 09:55 AM
And why do they need help from others? Cannot do it without a team/multiple accounts?

Sounds like they have failed the Challenge Test™ to me.

You make those rules to disguise you broke them yourself first I'd say.
It's really a shame I can't prove it yet, but it fits your personality as I have perceived it sofar rather well. I secretly believe you are against gifting in public just because you hope some annoyed people will gift you to punish you. I could have come up with that myself. I like those ploys. I admire you for that one. Heck, now it's no secret anymore, ooh sorry Tink, now they all know. No gifts for you anymore.
It doesn't matter, we will love you anyhow because you are so gifted.

abana
09-29-2009, 10:12 AM
And reguarding team/multiple accounts, methinks he doth protest too much.

Mr Ears
09-29-2009, 10:25 AM
He really could be considered as somebody with multiple accounts himself.

And the way he reacted to my gifts really supports Pontius' reckoning about how he really perceives gifts. Very subtle, but double-tongued and of course double standard... :D

Tink, Tink, Tink... /facepalm

thechris
09-29-2009, 02:56 PM
tink has muti accounts?:confused::eek::confused:
plz explain

Pontius Pilatus
09-30-2009, 09:45 AM
I will try though.

There is a player called Tinkerbell, in his second account Tinkerbell Returnz, then a player turns up called Tinkswing and starts singin praise of TR. Now I can believe a sycophant will try to mimic his master, but I can also suspect this just could be a second account by TR himself. As he always uses the accusation of doubleaccounting against his adversaries, I say he is so eager because he does it himself, a classic pot and kettle scenario. We will see, if my suspicions are true, he will reveal himself, he ain't that smart. In fact, he is a little bit under par as wits go.

Cheers!

Tinkerbell
09-30-2009, 10:34 AM
LOL !!!

tinkswingman is my good very young friend. He is my Wingman (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V8rZWw9HE7o) cuz I adopted him on the Sabah Trade Wall. He deleted his account & used this new name for 2nd account.

He rocks!

tink has muti accounts?:confused::eek::confused:
plz explain

Of course I don't Chris!

thechris
09-30-2009, 06:32 PM
tinkswingman is tinkerbells second account?
when did they plan on telling me?
considering that is my account, that i just got a third lvl 1 city on WHO

edit: how much more do i have to explian myself?

i didnt know that tinkerbell made a account with the password that i always use and my e-mail

Tinkerbell
09-30-2009, 07:13 PM
I just saw your 3rd city, Chris.

LOL !!!

Waaaaaaay out there IN the sticks ON sticks!

LOL !!!

:D

Mr Ears
10-01-2009, 11:44 AM
Maybe those who are following along would like to be informed that Tink keeps griefing and harassing my Theoris monuments. He of all people, who continuously accuses everyone else of griefing who uses military options (after being the biggest advocate of military PvP for years and years). Ain't that amazing?
The pot calling the kettle black? Seems so...

However, he is one of the worst strategists I've ever seen.... never succeeded in any of his military actions, or shall I rather say attempts....sad attempts :D

You were attacked by Billy Jack on 2:15am 10/01/2009
Result
You kept the monument!

You were attacked by Billy Jack on 2:16am 10/01/2009
Result
You kept the monument!

:D

Tinkerbell
10-01-2009, 01:11 PM
Boo

...sez the ghost...

:D

Mr Ears
10-01-2009, 02:10 PM
Sorry I haven't sent you a gift today so far.

As my warehouse is empty I need to produce something for you. Will send you a little present later tonight, okay? Promise!

:D

thechris
10-01-2009, 05:17 PM
notice that mr. ears has no friends.....