Page 2 of 2

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 3:18 pm
by abana
"setokaiba" wrote:I EXPLICITY TOLD PPL TO KEEP ON TRACK AND NO NEGATIVITY. SHOULD YOU FAIL TO CONTRIBUT CONSTRUCTIVELY I'LL SPEND SOME QUALITY TIME FINDING OUT HOW TO BAN YOU FROM THIS DISCUSSION!!!!!

TO ALL OTHERS IGNOR HIS COMMENTS. ARGUING WITH HIM WILL PROLONG THE SENSLESS BANTER OF AN ANTAGONIST WHO ONLY WANTS TO WINE AND NOT SOLVE. THIS IS A SOLUTIONS DISCUSSION. GOT IT. :p


I am betting that you are Speysider, anyone anyone with me?

I see the way that you persist in calling people "wusses" to be negativity.

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 4:28 pm
by PantherX
"abana" wrote:I am betting that you are Speysider, anyone anyone with me?


:eek:


It seems like the multiple server idea has been around much longer than the setokaiba account so perhaps you thought of it on your own but it is not a new idea.

As as suggested in another thread right here in this board, with multiple servers I think we should have one master account to contain all the user profiles (with single bank for scarabs). This way quested scarabs could only be used on the server where the questing happened. Purchased scarabs could be used on any server. But alas we are talking about tons of changes and who knows what may happen in the future.

:cool:

(still holding out that TM is perhaps making a new CB using the CoTN engine)

Posted: Mon Oct 25, 2010 5:47 pm
by Mr Ears
As long as TM does not provide multiple servers, the players should at least be allowed to have multiple accounts since I believe everyone should be free to establish their desired kind of gameplay.

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:25 am
by setokaiba
"Gregor" wrote:Shame you cannot keep your kool and have to resort to childish shouting.

Not the way to create solutions.

Plus,your opinions are yours... mine are mine.

If you do not like it, fill a bucket with ice and sit on it.


It wasn't your opion that was the issue, it was the way you expressed it, it was rude and vulgar is what it was and some people don't appreciate it, you can express your opinions without being rude and vulgar about it, and the caps wasn't meant to mean shouting, it was just the only way i could think to draw attention to what i said. My "cool" was never lost....

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:31 am
by setokaiba
Yes, I gues in a way I am thinking TM overhaul their system a bit. Most onlines games I play do it anyways. Active involvment from the creators is a must and making necessary changes to keep player interest. You can have an idea and then let it stagnate player interest will be lost. I guess they though the game not worth it. It's hard to say. I guess the fact that they let Sabah to its own devices speaks as much. That's why it would be nice to know if anyone from thier side is even monotoring the treads?

I guess multipule servers is a good idea if people keep brining it up then. ^_^ They should really do something about it. ;)

Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2010 10:05 am
by Keith
I think most of the TM staff is on hiatis. The only staffer seen around these parts in past six to eight months or more has been Jeff as he has been left in charge of boards in general since Reed left Tilted Mill. Jeff only shows up to take care of spammers and issue bans.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 4:32 pm
by Gregor
Heard a rumor the other day... supposedly TM is trying to sell NOL.

It is reported that the only offer received was much to low.

My source says that TM is now thinking about dropping the game entirely.

It no longer produces revenue and actually is costing them money to maintain.

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 6:48 pm
by Tinkerbell
"Gregor" wrote:Heard a rumor the other day... supposedly TM is trying to sell NOL.

It is reported that the only offer received was much to low.

My source says that TM is now thinking about dropping the game entirely.

It no longer produces revenue and actually is costing them money to maintain.


Credibility = ZERO

Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 6:53 pm
by abana
This is totally unsubstantiated, but does it have to be substantiated for it to be relevant?

Let's turn it around some more.

Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:34 pm
by Pontius Pilatus
This is totally irrelevant, but does it have to be revelated to be substant?

Cheers! :)

Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:58 am
by Q-Man
Does it have to be relevant to be reveled or elated, or for that matter, elevated? :)

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 4:25 pm
by Gregor
My source passed on some more "irrelevant" gossip.

According to him, there is a good reason... why the staff no longer posts on the forum.

Supposedly, most of them have been laid off.

Posted: Thu Nov 11, 2010 4:43 pm
by Keith
That's what I've been saying, but I didn't want to put it so directly.